Ian_Lee Posted May 24, 2007 at 11:56 PM Report Posted May 24, 2007 at 11:56 PM Who wields more influence in China's stock market? Wen Jiabao, Li Ka Shing or Alan Greenspan? In the last seven days, all three heavyweight figures said or tried to implement some measures to make the stock index of the bourses of Shanghai and Shenzhen turn south. The least effective is Premier Wen's. The stock market only hesitated for 45 minutes and then broke thru new high. But Greenspan's statement seems the most effective so far. Anyway, does anybody remember Greenspan's comment of "irrational exuberance" when Dow climbed past the 6,000-point benchmark? Quote
bhchao Posted May 25, 2007 at 12:25 AM Report Posted May 25, 2007 at 12:25 AM Anyway, does anybody remember Greenspan's comment of "irrational exuberance" when Dow climbed past the 6,000-point benchmark? Yes, he still exerts more influence today over the Dow than Bernanke. Global stock markets tumbled the day after he mentioned the possibility of a US recession during an HK conference earlier this year. All he had to do was mention the 'R' word. Quote
venture160 Posted May 25, 2007 at 04:32 AM Report Posted May 25, 2007 at 04:32 AM The HK and Taiwanese news circuit is saying that in reality its party cadres and their children who hold mosts of china stocks and that the shanghai faction is overinvesting in order to make the market crash and look Hu-Wen look bad. I read about this in the Financial Times and 明报 Could be a crazy conspiracy theory, but an interesting read nonetheless Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.