yingguoguy Posted April 17, 2009 at 07:26 AM Report Posted April 17, 2009 at 07:26 AM Twice in the past week I have been asked the same questions by different students at our university's English corner. Have you heard that Koreans believe that Confucius was born in Korea? Do you believe it? Now, even the second time I was asked, I didn't really have any response to this except polite confusion, and to express that I had always understood that he had been Chinese. This seems to be generating a lot heat amongst the students, and I couldn't really get any firm details from them there. Only what seems like over-generalizations, saying all Korean believe this... their history textbooks say... stealing Chinese culture. Unfortunately it's not easy to google this story, combinations of "was confucius korean" don't really work well as search terms. After trying for a while I was unable to come up with one single reference to this story in English. Neither China Daily nor Korean English Language on-line newpapers seems to have it. Trying “孔子 韩国“ yields quite a few stories and I tried the first one. I have to admit that, while I can read the basic outline of the story, the actual thesis is a little beyond my level. Have to laugh at the rebuttal though "The facts: Chinese legend says..." Anyway my questions to everyone. 1) Has anyone else been asked about this recently? 2) How seriously is this research taken? (Given there doesn't seems to be anything on English on the web about this, I already suspect an answer...) 3) Does anyone know what the general feeling amongst Koreans about this is? 4) Does anyone know of a good English write up of the argument, and maybe counter-argument? 5) How would you respond to Chinese students asking you about this? P.S. Story reminds me of the most effective way of irritating Captain Kirk. "You've not read Shakespeare until you've read it in the original Klingon" Quote
liuzhou Posted April 17, 2009 at 07:30 AM Report Posted April 17, 2009 at 07:30 AM I remember being told that Shakespeare was Arabic - Sheik Speer. Quote
gato Posted April 17, 2009 at 08:03 AM Report Posted April 17, 2009 at 08:03 AM Some consider Confucius to be a descendant of Jizi, who supposed settled Korea during the Shang Dynasty. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizi Jizi (Chinese:箕子, Gija in Korean)[1] was a semi-legendary Chinese sage who is said to have ruled Gojoseon by theory in the 12th century BCE. His family name was Zi/Ja (子) and given name was Xuyu/Suyu (胥餘/서여 xūyú/seoyeo, or 須臾/수유 xūyú/suyu). http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Gija The Koreans, especially Confucians, considered Jizi a Chinese sage who had brought Chinese civilization to Korea. During the Goryeo Dynasty, King Sukjong identified a mound near P'yŏngyang as Jizi's tomb. He built a mausoleum to enshrine him in 1102 C.E.. The throne rebuilt the mausoleum in 1324 and repaired it again in 1355. In the Samguk Yusa (1281?) and the Jewang Ungi (1287), the story of Jizi follows that of the Weilüe, but unlike Chinese sources, these sources add that Jizi succeeded Dangun, who had ruled Gojoseon. Most subsequent Korean history books follow that narrative. This is the correlation by which the Koreans can claim an association with both shamanism (from Dangun) and pre-Confucian China (from Jizi). Quote
gato Posted April 17, 2009 at 09:28 AM Report Posted April 17, 2009 at 09:28 AM yingguoguy, did they say why they are asking about that? You aren't ethnically Korean, are you? Quote
skylee Posted April 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM Report Posted April 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM This thread is relevant -> Phelps and the olympics Quote
yingguoguy Posted April 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM Author Report Posted April 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM In the first case I think we were talking about Korean pop music and soap operas. One of my students said they didn't like Korea and I asked why. In the second case I don't think there was anything really preceeding it. I was the foreign teacher at the English corner, and once one topic has dried up, anyone's free to ask other questions. In this case it was more like they were looking for support from a third party. I'm not in any way Korean. Thanks for the links, I'll look into them. Quote
yingguoguy Posted April 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM Author Report Posted April 17, 2009 at 10:51 AM Thanks, Skylee, I had searched to see if this question had been answered before, but I hadn't dreamed it would be on a Michael Phelps thread. Quote
Ah-Bin Posted June 7, 2009 at 08:25 AM Report Posted June 7, 2009 at 08:25 AM That is rather amusing. I always like to annoy people by saying Confucius wasn't Chinese at all. His biography in the Shiji 史記 says he was from Lu 魯, not "China". Quote
Music&MeForever Posted June 7, 2009 at 02:32 PM Report Posted June 7, 2009 at 02:32 PM Confucius wasn't Chinese at all. His biography in the Shiji 史記 says he was from Lu 魯, not "China". If we assume that the word China derived from 秦 then it must be true! Quote
stonelee Posted June 28, 2009 at 01:06 PM Report Posted June 28, 2009 at 01:06 PM His biography in the Shiji 史記 says he was from Lu 魯, not "China". 鲁 is shandong province in China today. Quote
stonelee Posted June 28, 2009 at 01:14 PM Report Posted June 28, 2009 at 01:14 PM Korean say Confucius was a korean is one of examples that they stealing Chinese culture! From Dragon Boat Festival to armillary sphere ,they nearly say everything belong to Korea... That's just a tip of iceberg... 文化侵略升级,韩国钱币竟然印上了浑天仪 Quote
Ah-Bin Posted July 4, 2009 at 01:39 AM Report Posted July 4, 2009 at 01:39 AM 鲁 is shandong province in China today. Today yes, but in Confucius' own time 鲁 was 鲁 not "China" Quote
trien27 Posted July 4, 2009 at 02:57 AM Report Posted July 4, 2009 at 02:57 AM It's been said that some Koreans believe that they are descended from a Chinese ancestor, but most don't, due to the fact that they don't use the same language as Chinese people today. I have read somewhere that a Korean ruler by the name of 李珥 was of Chinese descent. Whether that's true or not is always up for debate. BTW, "CONFUCIUS" is not his name. It is a Latinized version of his title, as addressed by his disciples/students: Kong Fuzi, where Kong is his last name & Fuzi is his title from Ancient Chinese, usually translated as "teacher" in English. But Chinese people DO NOT address someone of higher status with any parts of their name, the last name is used to tell people, presumably with the same title, apart. I actually saw a building, some sort of school here in New York, where they inscribed mostly the names of people from the Bible, but preceded by CONFUCIUS, which is followed by LAOTSE [correctly: Lao tz'u / Laozi], which seemed strange to me: Why would personalities from the Bible be preceded by a Chinese philosopher and Taoist? Following those Chinese names were MOSES, SOLOMON, DAVID, etc... I forgot the rest, there were like twenty names, but the first two are of Chinese people??? Quote
vampire Posted July 4, 2009 at 09:05 AM Report Posted July 4, 2009 at 09:05 AM Today yes, but in Confucius' own time 鲁 was 鲁 not "China" when ppl say 孙中山 is from 广东 will that makes him NOT from China? nowaday or in confucius' time, 鲁 is never china, it's part of Quote
Lu Posted July 4, 2009 at 03:40 PM Report Posted July 4, 2009 at 03:40 PM I think Ah-Bin's point is that in Confucius' time, there was no such thing as 'China' yet, only a number of warring states, that eventually, well after Confucius died, would be united to form one country, and only then was there something called 'China'. Quote
stonelee Posted July 4, 2009 at 04:11 PM Report Posted July 4, 2009 at 04:11 PM Today yes, but in Confucius' own time 鲁 was 鲁 not "China" You can say he was belong to the old China, but cann't say Confucius' not born in China. Quote
Lu Posted July 4, 2009 at 04:31 PM Report Posted July 4, 2009 at 04:31 PM I would never say that Confucius is not Chinese, but I wonder what he would have answered if you'd asked him where he was born. Quote
Hofmann Posted July 5, 2009 at 03:55 PM Report Posted July 5, 2009 at 03:55 PM He would say 魯. In Confucius's time China did not exist, while in 孫中山's time, 廣東 was part of China. Quote
stonelee Posted July 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM Report Posted July 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM while in 孫中山's time, 廣東 was part of China. You means 广东 is not part of China until 孙中山's time? It's my first time to hear this..... Quote
imron Posted July 6, 2009 at 01:02 PM Report Posted July 6, 2009 at 01:02 PM Stonelee, that's not what Hofmann said. In any case, don't let yourself be so easily manipulated. If you look at Ah-Bin's post, he said: I always like to annoy people by saying Confucius wasn't Chinese at all. I'm quite positive Ah-Bin knows the history and geography of China well enough. I'm sure he also understands enough about Chinese culture to understand the reaction it will provoke in Chinese people and that is why he says it. The more annoyed you act, the more amusing it is and the more you'll encourage people to continue to make remarks to get you annoyed. It's called trolling, and is a well known phenomenon on Internet forums. The easiest way to stop it, is to ignore it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.