imron Posted June 14, 2009 at 03:31 AM Report Posted June 14, 2009 at 03:31 AM It would seem that the default search function on the website searches for ANY word in the query rather than ALL words in the query. For example, if I search for "memorizing radicals", then the results are basically useless as you get a whole bunch of posts that mention "memorizing" but not "radicals" and another bunch of posts that mention "radicals" but not memorizing. i.e. it searches for memorizing OR radicals, rather than memorizing AND radicals. I'm sure it didn't use to work like this. Quote
skylee Posted June 14, 2009 at 09:23 AM Report Posted June 14, 2009 at 09:23 AM I just wonder about "didn't use to". Not sure I've learnt this pattern (the negative) before. The search function here is very unreliable IMHO. Quote
imron Posted June 14, 2009 at 11:31 AM Author Report Posted June 14, 2009 at 11:31 AM I just wonder about "didn't use to".It's the negative of "used to". The BBC at least agrees that it's not just me making up random English Quote
roddy Posted June 16, 2009 at 07:23 AM Report Posted June 16, 2009 at 07:23 AM This should be fixed once my computer finishes rebuilding the search indexes. Although I should have started it when I was already at home, looks like I could be sitting here some time Quote
889 Posted June 23, 2009 at 10:43 AM Report Posted June 23, 2009 at 10:43 AM I don't want to start another thread, so I'll throw in my complaint here that the search function doesn't let you search for an individual Chinese character, reporting that it's too short for a search. (Yes, searching on Google's a work-around, but not always a convenient one.) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.