Alveranter Posted August 21, 2004 at 06:48 PM Report Posted August 21, 2004 at 06:48 PM I've been planning to study yet another language, and since I don't find japanese that interesting, I've been thinking about korean.. is it worth giving a shot? Does it resemble japanese a lot? Quote
Quest Posted August 22, 2004 at 12:52 AM Report Posted August 22, 2004 at 12:52 AM 대한민국 지식 정보 문화의 중심 인터넷 영풍문고 엠파스 뉴스- 가장 빠른 뉴스 클릭큐 실시간번역- 세계화의 관문을 열어가는 Quote
Alveranter Posted August 22, 2004 at 10:15 AM Author Report Posted August 22, 2004 at 10:15 AM thanks.. Quote
nathanuk88 Posted August 22, 2004 at 10:30 AM Report Posted August 22, 2004 at 10:30 AM I was thinking about the korean language the other day, they have an alphabet (or so a website says) try this: http://langintro.com/kintro/first.htm Quote
Lu Posted August 25, 2004 at 04:18 PM Report Posted August 25, 2004 at 04:18 PM They do, and that's easy enough to learn. I got the impression the rest of the language is terrible, though, very hard grammar, words that are lian zai yiqi, lot of forms of politeness... good luck. Quote
yonglan Posted August 26, 2004 at 02:20 PM Report Posted August 26, 2004 at 02:20 PM Korean is in many ways similar to Japanese, or actually vice versa since Japanese *probably* came from Korean -- I will now be assassinated by some right wing yakuza type Yeah, lots of levels of politeness. What might make it most difficult to learn is so few resources. It's not a commonly learned language, so there aren't the number or quality of books one can find for learning English, Japanese, etc.. I lived there for a year and putzed about with the language a tiny bit. Since your profile says you know about a million languages, it would be easier for you I would guess. Quote
Alveranter Posted August 26, 2004 at 07:52 PM Author Report Posted August 26, 2004 at 07:52 PM yes.. chinese and japanese have really put korean in the shade.. it doesn't make it less interesting though, and as you say, the problem might be finding an adequate book.. attending a korean class could also be an alternative but I doubt such a course would start here in Sweden, the interest not being very high. Some people say japanese and korean are related to finnish (?).. any veracity in that statement..? Quote
yonglan Posted August 27, 2004 at 05:38 PM Report Posted August 27, 2004 at 05:38 PM Does Finnish put the verb at the end? Quote
shibo77 Posted September 5, 2004 at 08:26 PM Report Posted September 5, 2004 at 08:26 PM Finnish is Uralic, Korean is supposedly "Altaic". They are different families. Some people like to put them together into Uralic-Altaic, but even if it is of the same family, it would be of no help to your learning the languages. Altaicd is a theorised group. The other groups like Indo-European is very well established (but a theory also). But Altaic is not very accepted, and very stretchy. -Shibo Quote
Bamboo Grove Posted September 6, 2004 at 04:58 AM Report Posted September 6, 2004 at 04:58 AM The position of the verbs in Finnish is not similar to Korean or Japanese. We have the normal subject+predicate system as for example English. But we do have -ko, -kö added to the verbs to make questions just as Japanese have -ka and Koreans -kka Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.