Kenny同志 Posted September 18, 2010 at 11:18 AM Report Posted September 18, 2010 at 11:18 AM The sled is not fixed as is the case with the trees. Is this sentence unambiguous? I have the feeling that it can be interpreted in two ways. That is, both the sled and the trees are not fixed, or that the sled is not fixed, but the trees are? If the sentence is ambiguous, can it become definite if rephrased this way: The sled is not fixed, as is the case with the trees. Thanks in advance. Quote
anonymoose Posted September 18, 2010 at 11:20 AM Report Posted September 18, 2010 at 11:20 AM Yes, it's ambiguous, and I think adding the comma doesn't change this. Quote
Kenny同志 Posted September 18, 2010 at 11:25 AM Author Report Posted September 18, 2010 at 11:25 AM Thanks for your prompt reply. Really fast! Quote
889 Posted September 18, 2010 at 12:46 PM Report Posted September 18, 2010 at 12:46 PM That construction works only if both elements are positive: Jane is American, as is Tom. But not when the main clause is negative: Jane isn't American, as is Tom. [so ambiguous, it's nonsense.] Make it either: Jane isn't American, nor is Tom. or Jane isn't American, but Tom is. Quote
Kenny同志 Posted September 18, 2010 at 12:53 PM Author Report Posted September 18, 2010 at 12:53 PM Thank you, 889. nice tip. Quote
abcdefg Posted September 18, 2010 at 04:16 PM Report Posted September 18, 2010 at 04:16 PM The sled is not fixed as is the case with the trees. "The sled is not fixed, unlike the trees." This would get the job done. Quote
Kenny同志 Posted September 18, 2010 at 04:23 PM Author Report Posted September 18, 2010 at 04:23 PM good idea. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.