Jump to content
Chinese-Forums
  • Sign Up

More Advice for Learning Chinese: Possibly Controversial


Nathan Mao

Recommended Posts

This article (if you ignore the politics), makes a pretty good argument that when I say "tones are overrated", I'm confusing endpoint with shortcut.

I know someone (renzhe, I think) made a very similar point, and it was semi-persuasive, but this article was just worded the right way to really hit the point home for me.

 

I'm still glad we had the discussion, but I withdraw the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'd say that if you get mistaken for a native speaker, then your tones have to be all right.

But it is a fascinating topic, I don't think that there's a "right", "proper", "efficient" way to learn them. They are a bit of an orphan of Chinese language teaching -- tacked on as an afterthought because nobody really has a good system for learning them, and usually swept under the rug soon afterwards when the teachers give up, so nobody really learns them. It tends to click for really experienced long-time learners without ever understanding why, yet it is not automatic for everyone -- many people spend decades with awful tones without ever making progress.

It would be cool to hear about innovative magic methods for tones, like we have for characters and listening. And no, colours, orchestra conducting, gentle giants and Gwoyeu Romatzyh have never really mustered the sort of following that Heisig has, or Benny or Katzumoto...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In #25 OneEye said:

 

I'd argue that tones are more important than initials and finals... But my Taiwanese friends can have conversations without actually pronouncing anything but the tones. Mouth full of food? No problem. And they're surprised that I don't understand.

I find this to be true over and over and over here in Kunming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of informative value, the relative ranking in Mandarin is finals > initials > tones.

 

This may of interest academically, but it is of little practical value.

 

This is like ranking oxygen > water > food in terms of importance to sustain life. You can survive for longer without food than you can without oxygen, but in the end you still need all three.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...