有针对性地

[Vildhjerp]

Unless the context dictates otherwise, I'd take 给 as the main verb in the first sentence and 带 in the second.

This makes sense, as the 了, if not located at the very end of the sentence, must directly follow the main verb (of each separate action, of which in this case, there is only one).

[anonymoose]

It doesn't make sense to me. I think you could regard 带给 as a verb, but splitting off 给 leaves 带 on its own, which doesn't make sense.

[Vildhjerp]

That is, unless 带给 becomes a single verb in itself...

Understood.

[Tiana]

"带给" is no doubt one word, but in contrast with "给...带" in the sentence quoted, I was simply trying to pinpoint, in a shorthand way, the main element for each verb-phrase: in one it's 给 in the other it is 带. 

[陳德聰]

This makes sense, as the 了, if not located at the very end of the sentence, must directly follow the main verb (of each separate action, of which in this case, there is only one).

了 follows verb complements before objects quite often so this theory doesn't really hold.

 

As for 給 as the "main verb" (as you put it in #60), or even the "main element" in the verb phrase... I don't buy it. I parse 帶給 as verb+給 not as just verb.