gougou Posted August 17, 2005 at 05:08 AM Report Posted August 17, 2005 at 05:08 AM What I meant was, go ahead and drop the bomb if they don't surrender. That would be the best effort we can do. And there would be less people questioning the bombs today. Again, I didn't take the thought seriously and this kind of plan could never exist in reality. The way I read wushijiao's statement (and the way I read others before) is that the risk of sacrificing one bomb was a big one. After the inital test in the desert, there were only two left, and both not guaranteed to function. Say, you bomb an island, Japan is unimpressed, and the second one that you release over Hiroshima or Nagasaki malfunctions. Then America would have no alternative but fighting a ground war, at least until enough radioactive substance for a new bomb could have been won. But having said that, I too would have preferred an uninhabited island... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.