New Members Neil C Posted August 7, 2020 at 09:36 AM New Members Report Posted August 7, 2020 at 09:36 AM Hey guys. Can anyone recommend bilingual readers for Classical Chinese? There are similar editions for Latin (Loeb Readers), but as of yet I haven't found anything for Classical Chinese. Thanks! Quote
Luxi Posted August 7, 2020 at 11:51 AM Report Posted August 7, 2020 at 11:51 AM There's one in 3 volumes published by Princeton University Press, but I only know it only from references : Classical Chinese: A Basic Reader in Three Volumes, [Yuan. Naiying; Tang. Hai-tao; Geiss. James]. Published by Princeton University Press. Google Books has a good preview: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0O6dDQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false I'm sure that most of those texts are available individually online and many will include English translations (or you can find the English translation separately). There are also English translations of most if not all of the texts in the standard classical Chinese textbooks, and some classical poetry books and websites include word by word translations. There are plenty of individual classical texts in bilingual versions, both online and in print. For instance, all of James Legge's translations are available in bilingual books, as well as in electronic form. http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupname?key=Legge%2C James%2C 1815-1897 Several of those old translations have been incorporated in The Chinese Text Project . Here's a popular one: https://ctext.org/art-of-war/ 1 Quote
Demonic_Duck Posted August 7, 2020 at 12:18 PM Report Posted August 7, 2020 at 12:18 PM Presumably you mean bilingual Classical Chinese/English, not bilingual Classical Chinese/Modern Chinese? You can find the latter by searching something like [name of work] 原文 白话. For English translations, you can also try Project Gutenberg. For example, with the Dao De Jing: Original + English Original + Modern Chinese 1 Quote
New Members Neil C Posted August 10, 2020 at 08:20 AM Author New Members Report Posted August 10, 2020 at 08:20 AM Thanks very much. Yes, James Legge would have been a good choice, although the translations are often horribly wrong, for example, his understanding of the Classic of Odes was confounded by moralistic Confucian exegesis, which defined, what were essentially ancient campfire songs, as reflecting Confucian principles. It makes great reading, but very unreliable as translations for the modern reader. Chinese Text project is excellent, but also much of the work is in the public domain because it is so old. I have bought, loved, and reread the Princeton course. Maybe I should just buy some modern translations and read them alongside the original. Thanks, everyone. Some great advice here. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.