Jump to content
Chinese-Forums
  • Sign Up

Please help resolve a bet


DUDUBIRD69

Recommended Posts

As https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraak_ware says:

"Kraak was copied and imitated all over the world, by potters in Arita, Japan and Persia—to which Dutch merchants turned when, after the fall of the Ming Dynasty in 1644, Chinese originals were no longer available"

 

Even if the mark can not be taken as decisive that it is in fact Kutani ware, I think it's pretty decisive that you wouldn't find it on Chinese ware.

And given that according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kutani_ware it is "the modern understanding that much, if not most, of the Ko-Kutani production was around Arita", so that those wares are grouped together, I think your dad is very probably right.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...