Jack MacKelly Posted August 24, 2006 at 01:05 AM Report Posted August 24, 2006 at 01:05 AM CHINA plans a joint mission with Russia to explore Mars in 2009, Ye Peijian, the chief expert of China's deep space exploration, said in a conference yesterday, China News Service reported. Russia will launch an explorer Phobos-Grunt carrying a China Mars exploration device to explore the planet and Phobos, the Mars' moon. China's future deep space exploration will mainly focus on five aspects, Ye added. http://www.shanghaidaily.com/art/2006/08/24/289947/Russia__China_set_on_joint_Mars_mission.htm These exploration projects include launching a moon orbit satellite next year and further moon missions to accumulate experience and support the country's future deep space exploration endeavors. Additionally, space goals include development of interplanetary flight technologies, autonomous navigation systems and controllers and deep space telecommunications for implementing multi-targeted and multi-mission space explorations step by step. China, Russia plan joint mission to Mars http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=049671E28A386427E432B3370A22AAE4 Quote
hughitt1 Posted August 24, 2006 at 12:16 PM Report Posted August 24, 2006 at 12:16 PM Yea, Discover magazine recently had a special feature on the the U.S.'s goals for the coming years and the feasibility of actually getting to Mars any time soon. Seems like we are just about geared up to have a second space race, but this time with China (well Russia too i guess).I think i'm gonna have to put my money on China for Mars Keith Quote
gamerfu Posted August 24, 2006 at 12:27 PM Report Posted August 24, 2006 at 12:27 PM U.S. has already landed on Mars in 2004. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3365371.stm Quote
Jack MacKelly Posted August 24, 2006 at 05:30 PM Author Report Posted August 24, 2006 at 05:30 PM Yes, I watched some of those NASA/JPL missions to Mars they were great but the un-manned/robotic stuff is kind of over-done and it gets less public attention when compared to what Neil Armstrong and Buzz did. unmmaned mission are common - the Chinese have been launching un-manned satellites since the 70s United States sent stuff to Jupiter, robots to Mars, and to Saturn Japanese have launched comet probes Europeans ( German, British, French under ESA ) have sent unmanned mission to Mars and the Moon Russians have explored Venus and the Moon with robotic Rovers. The next big race might be putting people on Mars, to set up a future colony. There could be a race to go there such as the getting the stars n' stripes first before the Chinese astronauts/taikonauts start sticking a red flag in the planet to claim it as their own. The real superpower nation of this century might very well be the one who turns Mars into a 51st state or another red Province of Motherland China Quote
hughitt1 Posted August 24, 2006 at 11:17 PM Report Posted August 24, 2006 at 11:17 PM Yes sorry- i meant putting people on the red planet Quote
gamerfu Posted August 25, 2006 at 03:48 AM Report Posted August 25, 2006 at 03:48 AM lol, no problem! I could see that being a HOT topic! Quote
Jack MacKelly Posted September 1, 2006 at 04:35 AM Author Report Posted September 1, 2006 at 04:35 AM Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT.N: Quote, Profile, Research) has won a five-year, $3.9 billion contract to design and build a capsule-like U.S. spacecraft called Orion to take humans back to the Moon and beyond, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration said on Thursday. todayreuters Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed, the Pentagon's No. 1 supplier, beat a team made up of Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and Boeing Co. (BA.N: Quote, Profile, Research) to replace the aging space shuttle fleet as NASA's vehicle for human space exploration. A consortium led by Lockheed Martin will build the next spaceship to take humans to the Moon. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5304086.stm Nasa has awarded a multi-billion-dollar contract to the group to develop the Orion vehicle, which will replace the space shuttle when it retires in 2010. Quote
Taibei Posted September 1, 2006 at 05:35 AM Report Posted September 1, 2006 at 05:35 AM U.S. has already landed on Mars in 2004. The U.S. first landed probes on Mars in 1976 and had the first successful flyby in 1964. Quote
atitarev Posted September 1, 2006 at 05:38 AM Report Posted September 1, 2006 at 05:38 AM Onto Mars! (Mapc - 火星) http://www.newmars.com/forums/ Terraforming: http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=11 Quote
Jack MacKelly Posted September 10, 2006 at 12:25 AM Author Report Posted September 10, 2006 at 12:25 AM NASA Chief Prepares for China Visit http://www.space.com/news/060822_griffin_china.html NASA’s Mike Griffin is set for his own personal space travel trek next month, flying overseas to Russia, Japan, and China. Last April, during the visit of China’s President Hu Jintao to the United States, the Chinese extended an invitation to Griffin to tour their space facilities. “President Bush accepted that invitation, so the plan is that I will go. I’m looking forward to it,” he told SPACE.com. As far as hopes and expectations of the meeting, Griffin said: “I’m not really setting expectations. It’s a get acquainted visit. There are no pre-conditions on either side. There are no demands being placed. It’s a get acquainted visit to see where we might go and in forging cooperative ties with China.” Quote
ocpaul20 Posted September 11, 2006 at 01:17 AM Report Posted September 11, 2006 at 01:17 AM Just to stir the pot with a big wooden spoon.... All this is assuming of course that the moon landing was not all a big hoax. Could an Atari 64 have navigated its way (with human help) to the moon, I wonder. (Consipacy theorists unite!) Quote
Jack MacKelly Posted September 12, 2006 at 01:03 AM Author Report Posted September 12, 2006 at 01:03 AM What it boils down to is rocketry, today NASA haven't got any rocket that can compare to the monsterous Saturn-V and that's why they can't go to the Moon ( end of conspiracy ) Even the United States military hasn't built a new ICBM in decades. The Shuttle as nice as it looked in its young days was never designed to fly to the Moon so it spent all of its time stuck in low orbits around the Earth, also Shuttle is somewhat unsafe after the least accident and they won't be able to fly it forever so a new rocket will be needed. The Apollo Saturn compared to other Rockets http://files.turbosquid.com/Preview/Content_on_4_1_2002_16_18_25/rockets1.jpg199CB9CC-47FB-4CCC-B4514F3E80962FF2.jpgLarge.jpg There are only a few big rockets out there and none of their lift power compares to the old Saturn-V ( the Saturn rocket was also very expensive ) Boeing's Delta, the French/European Ariane rocket, China's LongMarch Launch Vehicles and the Russian Proton may all be good rockets and able to launch 10 tonnes into space But do they have the power to launch an entire Spacestaion in one go ( Skylab ) No they don't !!! Right now nobody has the ability to go to the Moon unless somebody builds a new Saturn-V sized rokcet Does anyone know a good link where I can view some of China's Long-March rockets ( 长征系列运载火箭 and I think they are named 长征二号C火箭, 长征三号B火箭, 長征系列運載火箭, 長征系列運載火箭 ? Quote
Jack MacKelly Posted September 12, 2006 at 01:07 AM Author Report Posted September 12, 2006 at 01:07 AM I found some here http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2005-10/11/content_3603877.htm I wonder what kind of rocket China would use if Chinese want to go build a base on the Moon, perhaps the Shenzhou craft could go because it already looks like Apollo crew ship. Apollo capsule ready for splash down http://perso.orange.fr/max.q/apollo/Missions/images/as15_csm_splashdown.jpg Could Shenzhou be used for the Moon ? http://www.spacenews.be/flash/shenzhou/shenzrecup.html Quote
ocpaul20 Posted September 18, 2006 at 03:10 AM Report Posted September 18, 2006 at 03:10 AM the re-entry module looks like an old boiler but I suppose the IBM computer has been using old and tried components for decades and they still seem to keep selling, so perhaps there is sense in it all. I wish I could read (more) french and some chinese to see what the articles are talking about. The pictures look interesting though. Now... what about that Atari computer in the lunar module....??? That was the state of computing in those early days and a more powerful computer would have needed to be the size of a mainframe (and they were pretty big) to process all those commands/communications/sensors/engines etc. Plus the fact that I cannot imagine the Apollo astronauts saying "hang on a moment Houston ....I just have to go and change a tape" (or a disk platter). Quote
Jack MacKelly Posted May 6, 2007 at 07:02 PM Author Report Posted May 6, 2007 at 07:02 PM There has been a lot of news this week about planets outside our own solar system. New space telescopes like the Hubble have been launched, some built in Europe, and NASA plans to launch a new mission soon. These space telescopes are now searching for new planets beyond our solar system http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2007-04-17/063011654198s.shtml COROT是迄今为止第一颗专门用于探索太阳系外行星的卫星,也是最便宜的搜寻太阳系外行星的卫星——造价仅为1.75亿美元。据悉,美国宇航局第一个探索地外行星的任务——“开普勒”(Kepler)太空望远镜预计将于2009年发射升空。此外,美宇航局和欧洲航天局还提出在未来二十年实施更为先进的探测任务。时报综合报道 据媒体报道,欧洲航天局发射的COROT卫星是迄今为止最先进的类地行星搜寻任务,可能在2010年前发现目标 They may have found a second Earth http://tupian.zjol.com.cn/05tupian/system/2007/04/25/008367478.shtml and are talking about the possibility of finding alien life on it 欧洲发现太阳系外首颗适合人类居住行星这颗行星质量约为地球五倍,距离地球20光年,围绕一颗名为“Gliese 581”的红矮星运转,因此被命名为“Gliese 581c”。到目前为止,在已经发现的约200颗太阳系以外行星中,Gliese 581c是最小的一颗。此外,它的运转轨道处于“可居住区”之内,如果其它条件合适,就有可能存在地表水和生命。 HK site http://failforum.net/forum/redirect.php?tid=522651&goto=lastpost 天文學家首次發現,在太陽系以外有一個與地球非常相似的行星,不排除上面會有生命。[新地球]命名為Gliese 581c,是一顆繞行位於天秤座Gliese 581紅矮星的太陽系外行星,距離地球約20.5光年, 其運行軌道與其太陽之間的距離剛好屬於適合生存帶,所以其表面溫度估計約攝氏0至40度,因此可能存在液態水。 由於液態水是生命存在的必要因素,所以Gliese 581 c有可能有生命存在 Quote
ocpaul20 Posted May 15, 2007 at 05:26 AM Report Posted May 15, 2007 at 05:26 AM Sorry to keep on, but it still baffles me thinking the moon landing was all done with the computing power of the day. I was computering in the 70's and although it was not quite valves and tubes still, it was all fairly Heath-Robinson even then. So, after all that, I am sure some of the boffins can come up with a reasonable, believable, and logical way the Americans could have aimed at the moon and found it, then turned around, aimed at the earth, and returned safely. I think it unlikely technology was at a stage that could have supported such a mission - even if they were using the computing power of a Cray they needed it to be water-cooled. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.